Sunday, March 17, 2019
Marxist Theory and Sport Essay -- essays research papers
This essay entrust be an attempt to bring unneurotic the ideas from our class readings about the Marxist sociological perspective as well up as insight from other readings to further my understanding of Marxism and its applications to sport. I will lay the groundwork for the possible action then proceed with how his theory is use to accessibility issues in sport, distribution of king in sport and commercialisation of sport.Basics of Marxist TheoryThe most widely used semipolitical and ideological system of thought is that of Karl Marx. Marxism is a set of ideas trying to put forward an explanation for human society. Although a little over a snow years old his theories and thoughts nurse led to coups, revolutions and new waves theories and academics. As well, it is this general theory that has led many academics to look at the focus they teach, discuss, save and even look at the way the world acts and thinks, even in spite of appearance their own small worlds. Within t he world of sport the ideological views confirm no real place however it is possible to equate the views of Marx to the idea of sport. Marxism is known as the interpretation of the thoughts of Karl Marx (1813 - 1883), a German social theorist and political revolutionary. Karl Marx wanted to understand the political relation, culture and economics of the newly uphill nations within Europe. He emphasized the leading role of the economy in society as a whole as well as in societal parts, known as superstructures. These superstructures are non-economic aspects of society, i.e. culture, religion, social life, education, religion, politics and social institutions. Marx identified society as consisting of two classes The so-called middle class and the so-called Proletariat. The Bourgeoisie is a capitalistic, wealthy and powerful minority consisting of nobleness and upper class members meanwhile the Proletariat, also known as working-class, holds the mass of societal members who are poor , semi- or unskilled workers. The Bourgeoisie owns the entire nitty-gritty of production and wealth, therefore they are powerful and hegemonic. Their hegemony is maintained because only they have access to the financial and productive means. Their ideologies, i.e. their thoughts and beliefs, are hegemonic and influencing as they have the power to establish them in society (Rigauer, 2000).In contrast, the Proletariat is alienated from and by the Bourgeoisie. Th... ... of sport in our society still cannot be ignored. Thus, giving his theory partial credibility in my opinion. While I struggled to understand how this instruction could be used directly in the field of sport administration, in the end, I have learned that simply being aware of unlike sociological theories can help to understand why society behaves the way it does in the sport context. This application is very indirect however, it will deliver me to approach future situations with a deeper understanding of sports in so ciety.ReferencesRigauer, B. (2000). Marxist Theories. In J, Coakley and E. Dunning (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Studies (pp. 28-47). Thousand Oaks, CA SageGiddens, A. (2001) Sociology 4th ed. Cambridge. polity Press. Haralambos, M. and Holborn, M. (2000) Sociology Themes and Perspectives 5th ed. London. HarperCollins Publishers Limited.Abercrombie, N. et al (2000) The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology 4th ed. London. Penguin Books.Manthorp, N. (2003) Guardian Unlimited Network. sport Article. Accessed Online. Available http//sport.guardian.co.uk/cricket/story/0,10069,870038,00.htmlSafai, P. (2005). Lecture Notes - APA 5304. January 18, 2005.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment