Communism vs. Hegelism Essay -- Philosophy, Hegel, Marx

In the late 18th and early 19th century, revolution was on the malarkey of the worlds collective tongue. The French monarchy was in the process of being overthrown there was political and civil unrest throughout Europe. In the midst of alone this turmoil Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel emerged, presenting an analysis of history that would echo through the future, an judgment of the human condition, and an estimate of the decision of said history and what would bring it about. This end of history would be brought about by the State, for the States restore purpose was to bring positive change and freedom to the individual. Less than a century later, Karl Marx released the Communist Manifesto. Marx had drawn heavily from Hegel for basis of his thoughts, yet he believed that Hegel failed to account for the largest hurdle to human freedoms, that of property something that could non be remedied in spite of appearance the State as it currently was. Hegel not only presented an o verly deluxe view of the future of mankinds history, but also an inherently empty approach to graveling that state. Marxs view of the future is not only more practical, but he addresses where purification is headed and how we willing stick there. Revolution, glorious revolution. //Still need to work on ending and changeIn many regards Hegel and Marx agreed with one anothers philosophies, primarily that of human history. Hegel states that history is a reasonable progression of human civilization toward its ultimate truth freedom for the individual. This path has been a rational deliver the goods from the earliest of humans to where we are now. As he states the history of the world, that its maturement has been a rational process that it represents the rational and necess... ... cornerstone, of the Manifesto is elucidated by Marx when he says Communism deprives no man of the power to appropriate the products of society all that it does is to deprive him of the power to subjugate the labor of others by means of such appropriation (Marx 383). By doing this, the oppression and control of individuals in society will be impossible freedom will finally be addressable to more than the bourgeoisie. Marx, not only addresses what needs to be done to reach the pinnacle, and concluding, point in history but he also lays buck a roadmap to reach there something that Hegel failed to. Hegel and Marx, two of the great romantic philosophers, constructed ideas akin(predicate) in many regards to one another. Their concepts of history, its eventual end, and their agreement that individual freedom is the perfect form of civilization were all closely in line.