Animal Testing and Researching Essay -- Biology Medical Biomedical Ani

zoology Testing and ResearchingAnimal examination is supported by some, but opposed to otherwises. The growing proceeds of animals used in research differs among the different countries. The fruit fly and nematode worm argon the most used animal in exam. However, the most normal mammals used in animal research are mice and rats. Shaved albino rabbits and guinea fowl pigs suffer severe testing for skin irritancy and eye irritancy. Though the purpose of non-human primates are outlawed in some countries, the U.S. still finds the involve to use them. The U.S. government uses tax dollars for testing pesticides and flourine products on animals.Animal testing has been a subject of controversy throughout the years. Though it may see like a ?cruel and unusual punishment? to some, others see it as an opportunity to expand the knowledge of our constantly changing society. These experiments are the starting line of a new perspective in scientific evolution, but an ratiocination for oth ers. Some examples of animal researching and testing would be mutagenesis, evolution, genetics, product safety, and so forth. jibe to the Laboratory Primate Advocacy Group, it is estimated that one hundred million animals are experimented on around the world and twenty-three to twenty-five million pass to the United States. The Department of Agriculture (USDA) states that in 2004, 26,573 rabbits, 105,678 farm animals, 64,932 dogs, 23,640 cats, 54,998 non-human primates, 244,104 guinea pigs, 175,721 hamsters and 171,321 other mammals--excluding mice and rats which make up over 80% of the upshot of animals tested on. The number of mice and rats are not recorded, but it is estimated that a plethora of these animals are utilized, ranging from fifteen million to twenty million. (Wikipedia... ...wn life. People?s beliefs differ with their background, whether animal testing is a pro or con. Nowadays, animals are tested a group more humanely than the past. Fortunately, researchers are f inding more alternatives to testing animals and the poetry of unnecessary deaths are decreasing.BibliographyBennie I. Osburn, DVM, PhD, Dean. The Mouse in Science why Mice? . . 1996. UC Davis. 22 July 2006 .Best, Steven Bentham, Jeremy Francione, Gary Langley, Gill . Wikipedia. . 23 July 2006. . 23 July 2006 .U.S. Government Testing Programs. . . . 23 July 2006 .World Animal Net Cosmetics Testing - Background. . . British Union for the abolition of Vivisection. .